Comments on: Help! https://www.beatlesbible.com Not quite as popular as Jesus... Mon, 01 Apr 2019 15:50:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.1 By: Tom https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-480597 Sun, 18 Nov 2018 15:27:27 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-480597 Does anyone know if an electric or acoustic 12 string was used on the Help recording? The videos show John and George playing 6 string guitars, but the Beatles Complete scores indicates the use of a 12, and it does sound like a 12 to me, but not sure if it was an electric or acoustic.

]]>
By: MikeP https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-479753 Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:51:06 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-479753 Of course, Johan never cites the sources of his outlandish, John-loving-Paul-hating claims.
Just a hunch, but I’ll bet they don’t exist outside of his own head. 😉

]]>
By: Raymond M George https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-453734 Sun, 08 Apr 2018 01:22:11 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-453734 The Capitol Single has a superior vocal track and more power…..but now it seems to be gone forever…..I don’t think a stereo mix exists of this better version.

]]>
By: Whilom https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-453115 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 23:09:19 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-453115 Yeah, as the years go on, McCartney is taking more and more credit. I recently saw on the tube John Lennon’s 75 birthday concert celebration where they interviewed McCartney. He specifically says something to the effect of “When I wrote Help”. I am paraphrasing, but he didn’t say “when we wrote Help”. He is also now adamant that he wrote “In my life”. He also is starting to claim a larger and larger fraction of the early pieces. They’re all hollow claims now since John isn’t here to dispute him.

]]>
By: Nicholas Jensen https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-452593 Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:39:57 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-452593 I know we’re 3 years later at this point, but it’s available on the new 1+ release with quite a few of the videos that came out a year or two ago.

]]>
By: Lars Arvid Kollstrøm https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-452445 Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:01:24 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-452445 As Paul Gambaccini put it, in the 60s people didn’t know who wrote what. That didn’t happen until the 70s, when John started giving interviews, carving up the empire between himself and Paul. So, if anything, John was the original revisionist. (I wrote a much longer text, but something went wrong. If it also suddenly appears, I can only apologise.)

]]>
By: Lars Arvid Kollstrøm https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-452444 Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:51:18 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-452444 Beatlesebooks have got this quote: ‘Interestingly, the song actually began to be written well in advance of the movie, which is contrary to popular opinion. “We wrote it in my house (Kenwood),” Lennon stated shortly after the song was released. “I had a little bit of a song, which I’d played around at writing, called something like ‘Keep Your Hands Off My Babe.’ Anyway, it was floating around for a long time and, when Paul came over, we decided to, sort of, adapt it. We wrote ‘Help!’ after we had been told of the film’s title. We never write to fit in with the story line, but this one seemed to fit okay.”’

]]>
By: Mr Mustard https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-451833 Wed, 02 Aug 2017 17:52:23 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-451833 Occasionally, as with all big bands and their recollections of inspiration, I tend to think it’s a great story rather than hard fact. In early 1965 Motown released The Supremes, Stop! In The Name Of Love. A few weeks later The Beach Boys released Help Me, Rhonda. I prefer to believe these songs were an influence on the writers much more than they might admit to.

]]>
By: J Neo Marvin https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-451064 Tue, 02 May 2017 23:55:06 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-451064 I hear the two of them singing in unison. George’s voice is more nasal, so it cuts through more.

]]>
By: Dan L https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-450714 Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:39:18 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-450714 Same here. I still think that jazzy, James Bond-ish tacked on intro works great!

]]>
By: Taxi-Steve https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-450696 Thu, 23 Mar 2017 03:24:48 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-450696 Glad I’m not the only one who has noticed this.

]]>
By: Lauri https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-450491 Mon, 20 Feb 2017 05:06:09 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-450491 I agree that slower tempo suits this song well, a good example of an attempt maybe Roxette’s 1995 cover version also recorded at Abbey Road. Though I still like the original

]]>
By: Robert https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-449432 Wed, 28 Sep 2016 01:06:49 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-449432 On what show in 1990 did Paul McCartney claim to have written “Help”? Please cite this claim. Thank you.

]]>
By: Pablo Castro https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-449231 Mon, 05 Sep 2016 03:40:25 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-449231 It´s not like Dear Purple, but it´s slower and beautiful : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeySOG1QQZc

]]>
By: Pablo Castro https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-449230 Mon, 05 Sep 2016 03:35:54 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-449230 Dear Joe, I think it would be appropriate to state that John played 12-string acoustic guitar. “Rhythm guitar” sounds like it was an electric guitar, to distinguish from the lead electric guitar.

]]>
By: Otis https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-448533 Thu, 12 May 2016 05:08:06 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-448533 I can’t even hear Paul on this. I only hear George on backing. Paul seems to be missing, at least to my ear.

]]>
By: manteau https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-448277 Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:22:17 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-448277 Dear Laura, the video you mention is, I believe, part of the TV show “The music of Lennon and Mc Cartney”. it was broadcast in late 65, probably december and also features “Day tripper” and “we can work it out”.

]]>
By: Johan cavalli https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-445304 Sun, 31 May 2015 08:37:13 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-445304 The greatness of John Lennon´s ability to compose is that he has two kinds of melody-mobilities. One outer mobility, and one inner mobility. In the outer mobility the melody moves up and down (that´s what George Martin like), or uses several notes. In the inner melody, the melody consists of almost one note, but instead the accompaniment changes. In that case the song will be more expressive, like this wonderful song Help from 1965. This song would have been even more expressive in a lower tempo? I even think the melody would had been more beautiful without the countermelody.
Many composers use sometimes only one note,to get the music more expressive. Listen for example to Purcell´s Dido and Aeneas: “…remember me, remember me…” In Verdi´s Otello there are often only one note used.
In the years 1963-1965, or before Yesterday, Lennon was the dominant composer. That embarasses McCartney enormously. In a show 1990, McCartney dared saying he wrote Help! But after MacDonald´s book Revolution in the Head 1994, McCartney admitted Help is a Lennon composition

]]>
By: kenlacouture https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-444982 Sun, 26 Apr 2015 23:05:50 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-444982 And, of course, I need to correct myself yet again! “That Means A Lot” did receive a reduction mix, but it wasn’t to another 4 track tape — it involved combining two of the tracks down to an empty track on the same tape. (Source: Recording The Beatles, page 390)

So in summary…

a) More than a few tunes received 2-track to 2-track reductions before 1965

b) “That Means A Lot” was the first tune recorded on 4-track to receive a reduction mix of any kind, but it was an “internal” reduction to the same tape.

c) “Help!” was the first tune that reduced one 4-track tape to another 4-track tape

]]>
By: kenlacouture https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/comment-page-1/#comment-444949 Thu, 23 Apr 2015 03:40:14 +0000 http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/help/#comment-444949 Some sources list it as the first song done on 4 track to receive a reduction mix to another 4 track tape. However, it would only qualify as the first released song to receive this treatment, as the first version of the unreleased “That Means A Lot” also received the same reduction.

]]>